Ban the Bastards!
March 20, 2008
One often hears of illiteracy, poverty, unemployment and inequalities banded about as the greatest of curses facing mankind. However one fact that all seem to be neglecting is that all these ills can exist only in a society. Only an organised human society breeds them. If there is no society, they too wont exist. Hence you can look forward to their eradication in a century or so. But, you would ask, why is society in danger? The answer is simple: Religious Hatred and Fanaticism.
Hatred for another person is nothing new. The Romans hated the barbarians, the Jews; gentiles, Christians; non-Christians and Muslims; non-Muslims. However the disturbing trend started about half a century ago when political parties that infact thrived solely on stoking up religious and ethnic tension, started to get into governments and implementing their fanatic policies. Hitler’s Nazi Party is a prime example.
I’ll confine myself to India here. For close to 50 centuries now, Indian culture has prided itself on its openness and ability to embrace all. It is true that this openness was not extended to its some of its own people who were treated as Untouchables. However, by and large the Indian ethos has been one of tolerance. Something that is sadly under seige today. And the worst part is that the people who are responsible for this seige are today the ones who rule India.
Bharatiya Janta Party: The BJP, as it is otherwise known is probably the most successful of these fanatics. Bharat Jalao Party would be a more apt name for a party that in 28 years of its existence has already carved a trail of blood throughout India. Perhaps the most macabre dance of mass communilastion was orchestrated by its leader, LK Advani (also known as AdolfVani). From 1989-92, Advani and his cohorts started more than 80 riots throughout India that claimed more than 30,000 lives, 12,000 in Bhagalpur alone where victims of mass murder were buried in shallow cauliflower fields. It then demolished the 400 year old Babri Masjid, claiming it to be the Ram Janambhoomi Temple in the absence of any archaeological evidence. It has been exploiting Ram’s name ever since, holding shilanyases, karsevas and what not! Through the backing of NRIs (Neophyte and Renegade Indians) it enjoyed power for close to 6 years, when it oversaw a mass holocaust in Gujarat and numerous other riots throughout North and Central India. Ousted from power in 2004, it is currently in the process of creating another Ayodhya in Bhojshala and Baba Budangiri. Definitely a confirmed party of motherfuckers!
All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimin: A much smaller party than its saffron counterpart, this is nevertheless, another confirmed party of S.O.Bs. It has virtually run Old Hyderabad for 40 years now. A party run in mafia fashion, it has orchestrated more than 20 riots in Hyderabad and in the process has made the Old City the most underdeveloped and decrepit part of Hyderabad. It has the dubious credit of having made peaceful Hyderabad, a communal hotspot. Having brought nothing but misery to the people, it deserves a well placed kick on the ass. The sooner its leaders are arrested and their gangland connections investigated, the better it’ll be.
Akali Dal: The Sikh counterpart of the above two moron associations, this party played a most shameful role in the Punjab of late 70s and 80s. It whipped up hatred against the indigeneous Non-Sikhs there and still openly swears by Bhindranwale and his bunch of mad dogs aka The Khalistanis. The industrious Sikhs were put to untold hardships because of these loony morons and for 20 years, development all but stopped in Punjab. Real deservers of the ugly finger.
Also earning a honourable mention in my list of bastards are:
Indian Union Muslim League: For running a party solely based on religion and swearing by the two nation formula of Savarkar and Jinnah.
Indian National Congress: For directly patronizing the Khalistani menace under Sanjay Gandhi’s directions, For massacring Sikhs is 1984, for consistently bowing to fantics of all kinds, For allowing the growth of BJP and communal politics through its inaction and covert collusion and for espousing soft Hindutva, a malaise no less than its hardcore version.
My test for a proper party is simple. If it is open solely to people of one religion (eg-IUML), if its top functionaries are from anti-India organisations that preach hatred (eg-BJP) or it has a history of whipping up caste, ethnic or religious tension (eg-Shiv Sena) then that party has no right to exist. The land of Ram, Rahim, Kabir and Vivekanand deserves better. Ban these bastards before their politics of hate tears India apart!
Entry Filed under: Social/Political. Tags: BJP, Hindu, India, Muslim, Muslim League, riots, RSS, secularism.
7 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
kamala sripada | March 21, 2008 at 6:20 pm
hey!!! i ma going to well make it very me!!
so yeah the look of the blog is super sexy!!keep it that way–also do explain what those pics on the top are
the tag line is soovery YOU-ish!!and so the comment[no it would have come even otherwise]
and the post???well absolutely agree with you!!
my favourtie line:The land of Ram, Rahim, Kabir and Vivekanand deserves better.
keep it going!!!
love.
peace!!
2.
saikumar | April 9, 2008 at 12:53 pm
the last paragraph deserves to be framed and kept in the living room all those polticians
3.
R.V.Ramani | July 5, 2008 at 8:03 pm
‘In a country that prides itself on its religious diversity and its secular constitution, may see the rise of Modi and his pro Hindu agenda as a terrifying chapter of intolerance. They say he is dangerous fire brand and too comfortable inciting the politics of hatred and violence.’ States Sam Dolonick in his article published in the recent issue of ‘The Economist’. Besides holding Narendra Modi solely responsible for the riots of 2002 he also makes the baseless and completely concocted allegation that ‘The RSS was influenced by 1930s German fascism.”
It’s not that he doesn’t acknowledge the unparalleled achievements of Gujarat Chief Minister. In fact he does when he says ‘Modi has attracted more than 20% of the India’s total investment of $69 billion last year’ but he makes a foul attempt of trying to make it irrelevant by adding ‘But despite his achievement, for may of India’s 1.1 billion people – 14 per cent of who are Muslims – Modi will always be defined by the anti-Muslim violence…’ The ’cause of hate’ against Modi is, frankly speaking, owing to his Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) background, the organization which is today whipping boy of the mainline media and, so called, ’secular’ organizations.
‘The Economist says is influenced by the Fascist ideology. Need I say how concocted is this idea, i.e. of RSS being influenced by Fascist? Absolute bunk! RSS is, in fact, in response to the brutal history of Islamic Conquest, that which American Historian Mr. Will Durant called ‘the bloodiest in history’. The current aspersions against the RSS mostly by the media, Congress and Communist followers to the effect that it is a ‘communal organization, most dangerous to the country than even communism’ are a complete travesty of fact.
The Ideology of Hindutva which is propounded by the RSS, and followed by Modi, offers a room for all minorities on a condition of their whole hearted submission to the supreme value of the nation in their lives. The nation is a vehicle of universal truths and is not an entity above them. This is no chauvinist nationalism of the kind associated with Mussolini or Hitler. It teaches loyalty and devotion to the national society in the national homeland under the image of the mother. The unity and solidarity of the motherland taught to claim the highest sacrificial devotion from the citizen body.
Whoever enters into this spirit of devotion to the nation as a spiritual unity of the land and people are Indians or Hindus in essence. The mental commitment should be final and supreme. The Muslims and Christians have perfect freedom of worship, so long as they do not destroy and undermine the faith and symbolism of the national society. They should subordinate their exclusive claims for final and sole revelation vis-à-vis the national society. They could bear witness to their faith in life and speech but they should not indulge in any unfair and unspiritual modes of conversions. The national identity requires that the whole of the national society, including minorities, should share in the best values of the past. They should appreciate national Dharma – the code of ethical principles and ways of life. The cultural history, they should all give their mind and hearts whole-heartedly to an appreciation of the best types.
Rama and Krishna may be appreciated by non-Hindus as secular examples while the Hindus will see them as full spiritual exemplars, or avatars. Now considering this ideology, I wonder as to what is so ‘dangerous’ about it, so as to look at it dangerous than communism? I would be delighted if the people who put in such allegation help me to understand. Be that as it may. Let’s consider the following case: In the late 1980s, Abdul Latif was the underworld king of Gujarat. Later, he became Dawood Ibrahim’s business manager in the state and was one of criminal dons to make what now seems to be the shameless transition from organized crime to terrorism. Latif was also the suspect in the Mumbai blasts case of 1993; the RDX and other explosive devices for that operation landed, remember, on the Gujarat coast. In November 1997, Latif was killed in an encounter with the Ahmadabad police.
Many of the Latif’s cohorts were put under watch. One of them was his driver, apparently responsible for, in one daring move, hiding a huge cache of weapons meant for terrorist groups. This was part of the consignment that had arrived before Mumbai blasts of 1993. Latif was under surveillance so his driver had hidden the arms in a well in his (the driver’s) native village near Ujjain. The driver eventually faced over 50 cases including some under the National Security Act; He was arrested at various stages, by the Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh police, but avoided conviction. When not facilitating terror networks, he was engaged in extortion rackets in Rajasthan, acting almost certainly on behalf of others. His principals, the police believe, may be linked to terror funding groups. The Latif’s driver’s name was Sohrabuddin Sheikh. Yes this was the same Sohrabuddin for whose encounter Modi was being scrutinized by his political rivals and the media. ‘A nationalist is being harassed for having exterminated a terrorist!’ by the media that calls itself ’secular’ and ‘nationalist’.
What a pity. If you may observe in detail of the propaganda carried on by the Media in Gujarat and in other part of the world, at the same time, you would find that: While Dr. Haneef, a doctor who flew from Glasgow in UK to Australia under mysterious circumstances, and who was arrested by the Australian authorities was given such a terrific support by the media as if they were convinced and simply wanted to convince the world that he wasn’t a terrorist. It may be noted that simply because he was allowed to return to India on benefit of doubt the media almost declared his victory as theirs, before even he was tried in the court of law. Our Prime Minister, Mr. Manmohan Singh, went on record to say that he ‘lost his sleep’ for Haneef. On contrary to this when ethnic Hindus in Malaysia made a peaceful demonstration against the destruction of their temples by pro-Islamic-fundamentalist regime and were sabotaged ruthlessly and put to jail, our very own Karunanidhi’s grievances, put forth the Central Government, were simply brushed aside, he was asked to lay off the issue rather ruthlessly. Media made little publicity of the issue. When it’s a question of Hindus getting unfair treatment in a Muslim majority region, the ‘civil, sophisticated and articulate’ Muslim intellectuals take refuge in the statement that it’s a matter concerning a foreign country. But when it’s a question regarding a cartoon or a fatwa for beheading a writer, they say - we are a global Ummah, anything happening anywhere to Muslims is our common concern! All big lies and a bigger hypocrisy traded in the name of a religion. So much for their hypocrisy! But why is it so? Let’s go in to a bit detail. When Muslims are in trouble there is a cry of intolerance from the whole of the Islamic world led by the Arabs.
The Pope cries foul when there is problem facing Christians. Communists in India are supported by their comrades in China. But why is it that none cries or express even a word of concern when Hindus are in trouble? Today thousands of Kashmiri pundits, who were driven out of their homes by Jihadi Muslims after torturing them and even raping the women, are living as refugees in their own country. No media cares for them. Instead more special privileges are given to the Kashmir as an incentive and they continue to play lame politics of ‘Azad Kashmir’ (read Independent Kashmir) with Indian Government. Our forces who risk their lives are blamed and abused for unproven allegations. Recently, in Kashmir, an Army Jawan was stripped off and made to walk nude in the public for attempting to rape a woman.
Is it so? Then why is it that the same people were sitting so silently when those terrorists were killing and raping their people? Why didn’t they ever boycotted them and gave a similar treatment? Why doesn’t a Maulvi, anywhere in India, issue a fatwa against a Jihadi terrorist? No answers. But that is understandable. The pure hypocrisy, of the Muslim Clergy and Politicians, is the answer. But why is the media sitting mum? Why aren’t they speaking? Have you ever thought of a reason? I did. The reason is because Hindus don’t have a strong Lobby of their own. If you take the case of Israel, you will find that though it is a small land they continue to live against all odds surrounded by their enemies from all the directions with rightful support of Americans. Americans are under obligation to support Israel because Jews, who also form a majority in Israel, control American Economy.
Palestinians though haven’t been anywhere successful to have a worthwhile economy for themselves and having spend six decades in building a legacy of hatred and violence continue to gain ’sympathy’ and ’support’ from the Media as a result of the financial expenditure by the Arab Lobby Supported by Arab Nations. When Christians are persecuted in Pakistan Pope cries foul and American along bring in their pressure to put a halt on it. But what is the case with Hindus? Who are they to look for? As Arabs for the Muslims, Vatican for the Christian and Israel for the Jews who is for Hindus? It’s sad but true that Hindus have none to look far. The only Hindu country, Nepal, is today under the clutches of Communists, with its King virtually in exile. India has, what it is proudly called, a ‘Free Press’ that which is run by private organization without governmental controls. We have series of Television News Channels in various languages. And not a single one ever clarifies its source of income. They never specify who funds them in their websites do they? Yet they have with them millions of dollars. Where did this money come from? You must agree with me that a majority of funding comes from international sources. But why would any organization invest in a media organization? Yes it would be for profitability, if you say it just like that. But there is more than profitability, don’t you think? Every journalist has with him/her an inclination towards the Arab or the American or the European world. Don’t they? Isn’t it possible then that they also subscribe to ideologies of that part of the world? Certainly they will, and beyond doubt. So if they have with them an ideological inclination then it is very much possible that they would have hardly any chance to criticize those people who are of interest to their principals. So when you have so many Medias everyone is certain to have one kind of the ideology or the other, except Hindu, represented. Thus the only favorite whipping boy available is the RSS and its allied organizations. Isn’t it so? So there you are. These different lobbies have a phenomenal financial power. The Jews gain their financial power, as said before, through the various business enterprises that are vital for American Economy including the press. Jews are said to be controlling the American Economy virtually.
Muslim Lobby led by Arabs gain their financial muscle through petro economy, where billions of dollars are earned by them almost without any efforts and also invested in Global Terrorist endeavors. Since true journalistic spirits exists hardly anywhere in the modern day, media corporations are exclusively concentrated on financial profitability. Given this it’s not a great deal to make these Lobbies to run the propaganda of their kind in their supported Medias. And given there isn’t any Lobby for the Hindutva faction; they are to be the easy target of such propaganda. Won’t you agree? This is high time for Hindus to organize an internationally influential Hindu Lobby. Do you think that it is difficult to form one? Certainly not! Consider this: When NDA government had organized ‘Pravasi Bharatiya Divas’ there were so many Non Resident Indians, most of whom were Hindus who had expressed their interest to be of some use to their land. When, after Pokharan II, India was showered with various international sanctions, let us never forget it was our fellow NRI’s who came to the rescue by subscribing to Yashwanth Sinha’s, then Finance Minister’s, Resurgent India Bonds. Before NDA regime was over India had with it a Foreign Exchange in excess of $100 billion. Doesn’t this portray the willingness of our Diaspora? The only thing that would be needed is desire, first, followed by unrelenting determination. Simply put ‘Creating a Pro Hindu Lobby is not an option… but a sheer necessity.’
2.Let us know how many muslims or other minorities condemn an attack by terrorist or naxalites. Giving below the Kargil heroes and you can imagine the muslim participants against war with Pakistan:
Kashmiri Pandits all over the world are greatful to these worriors and brave sons of the land for defending the Kashmiri Pandit .
You can see the participation of minorities in the Kagil conflict if any?
India was primarily involved in the formation of Bangla Desh? In the recent death of the Field Marshal Maneckshaw can you guess the Bangla deshis or muslims condoning the death?
See http://www.hindurashtra.org/bangla_infiltration.wmv for proof?
Even the land allotted to Hindu pilgrims for visit to Amarnath temple also taken back?
W.o. parties like BJP there will not be any say for Hindus in India. In states like Kerala soon Hindus will be less than 50% of population..
RVRamani
4.
Saif | September 22, 2008 at 5:03 pm
I am devastated to let you know that the Qur’an and its Prophet (PBUH) have commanded their followers to wipe out EVERY SINGLE non-Islamic religion (and that includes Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism and even Atheism) by killing or converting the latter’s adherents to Islam relentlessly – until the whole world submits to Islam.
In fact, I don’t want you to believe me at all. But I do request you to patiently read the writings of several Arab, Pakistani, Iranian and Bangladeshi free-thinkers who have exposed the Islam as a “Arab Imperialistic Totalitarian Political Ideology” that masquerades as a religion.
1) I especially recommend Dr. Ali Sina’s articles at: http://www.FaithFreedom.org/testimonials.htm
5.
Saif | September 22, 2008 at 5:03 pm
2) And the writings of the late Anwar Shaikh, M.A.Khan, Abul Kasem, Ayesha Ahmed, Mumin Salih and other brave souls at:
http://www.islam-watch.org/LeavingIslam/index.html
3) If you like buying a book instead of reading articles, I would request you to google up this Pakistani author’s name: “ ibn warraq ”
6.
Saif | September 22, 2008 at 5:03 pm
4) In the Qur’an, just replace the word “Non-Muslim” with the opposite word “Muslim” ….. and lo, presto ! What do you see? Hate Speech? If you don’t get the idea, see this first page: http://www.TheReligionOfPeace.com/Articles/Quran_Hate.htm
7.
Saif | September 22, 2008 at 5:04 pm
5) Is the Qur’an Hate Propaganda? You take a look at this second (different) page and tell me, ok?: http://www.TheReligionOfPeace.com/Pages/Quran-Hate.htm
Peace.